Free: Contests & Raffles.
I'm not the sharpest bulb in the drawer so maybe I'm reading this wrong, but basically they want the current commission and the governor (Ferguson) to appoint the new director who is now in charge of a bunch of stuff that the commission was previously in charge of... am I close here?
Quote from: Mtnwalker on January 28, 2025, 03:49:26 PMI'm not the sharpest bulb in the drawer so maybe I'm reading this wrong, but basically they want the current commission and the governor (Ferguson) to appoint the new director who is now in charge of a bunch of stuff that the commission was previously in charge of... am I close here? That's how I read it as well. What could go wrong there
I’m concerned this part is struck from section 2((Persons eligible for appointment as director shall havepractical knowledge of the habits and distribution of fish andwildlife. The director shall supervise the administration andoperation of the department and perform the duties prescribed by lawand delegated by the commission. The director shall carry out thebasic goals and objectives prescribed under RCW 77.04.055.))
Quote from: Mtnwalker on January 28, 2025, 03:49:26 PMI'm not the sharpest bulb in the drawer so maybe I'm reading this wrong, but basically they want the current commission and the governor (Ferguson) to appoint the new director who is now in charge of a bunch of stuff that the commission was previously in charge of... am I close here?No.What the bill does is make the WDFW Director a position appointed by the governor. The commissions authority will be gutted and essentially turned into an advisory commission for the Director.Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk