collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill  (Read 5941 times)

Offline Practical Approach

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 690
HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« on: January 28, 2025, 03:29:03 PM »
I am not sure what to make of this one.  Initially I am suspicious and skeptical.


https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary/?BillNumber=1685&Year=2025&Initiative=false

Online Mtnwalker

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 2274
  • Location: Selah
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2025, 03:49:26 PM »
I'm not the sharpest bulb in the drawer so maybe I'm reading this wrong, but basically they want the current commission and the governor (Ferguson) to appoint the new director who is now in charge of a bunch of stuff that the commission was previously in charge of... am I close here?

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10649
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2025, 03:55:22 PM »
I'm not the sharpest bulb in the drawer so maybe I'm reading this wrong, but basically they want the current commission and the governor (Ferguson) to appoint the new director who is now in charge of a bunch of stuff that the commission was previously in charge of... am I close here?
That's how I read it as well.  What could go wrong there :chuckle:
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 15979
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2025, 03:56:53 PM »
I’m concerned this part is struck from section 2

((Persons eligible for appointment as director shall have
practical knowledge of the habits and distribution of fish and
wildlife. The director shall supervise the administration and
operation of the department and perform the duties prescribed by law
and delegated by the commission. The director shall carry out the
basic goals and objectives prescribed under RCW 77.04.055.)
)
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Online Mtnwalker

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 2274
  • Location: Selah
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2025, 03:58:56 PM »
I'm not the sharpest bulb in the drawer so maybe I'm reading this wrong, but basically they want the current commission and the governor (Ferguson) to appoint the new director who is now in charge of a bunch of stuff that the commission was previously in charge of... am I close here?
That's how I read it as well.  What could go wrong there :chuckle:

A single source of more power appointed directly by the Governor's office. Color me skeptical

Offline fishngamereaper

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 8760
  • Location: kitsap
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2025, 04:04:31 PM »
That's like deciding to cut off your right arm or your left arm...

I really don't see a good outcome...

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 15979
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2025, 04:06:01 PM »
I see the word preserve a lot and I’m concerned at all the stuff struck in section five about maximizing opportunity to hunt and fish.
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline full choke

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2714
  • Location: Maple Valley
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2025, 04:07:08 PM »
I’m concerned this part is struck from section 2

((Persons eligible for appointment as director shall have
practical knowledge of the habits and distribution of fish and
wildlife. The director shall supervise the administration and
operation of the department and perform the duties prescribed by law
and delegated by the commission. The director shall carry out the
basic goals and objectives prescribed under RCW 77.04.055.)
)

Pretty odd thing to strike out, unless you plan to destroy the way things have historically been run...
"If you think our wars for oil are bad, wait until we are fighting for water..."

Offline MeepDog

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2021
  • Posts: 709
  • Location: SE Washington
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2025, 04:07:33 PM »
Also this part where the newly appointed person wouldnt have to abide by the same rules the commission currently feels theyre hamstrung by.

Wildlife, fish, and shellfish are the property of the state. The
((commission, director, and the)) department shall preserve, protect,
perpetuate, and manage the wildlife and food fish, game fish, and
shellfish in state waters and offshore waters.

Offline fishngamereaper

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 8760
  • Location: kitsap
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2025, 04:11:30 PM »
Press release Gov fergtard.
I'd like to congratulate Lorna Smith on her newly appointed position of Director of the wdfw... :mgun2: :stup: :mgun: :mor: :stirthepot: :ban:

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10626
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2025, 05:07:35 PM »
I'm not the sharpest bulb in the drawer so maybe I'm reading this wrong, but basically they want the current commission and the governor (Ferguson) to appoint the new director who is now in charge of a bunch of stuff that the commission was previously in charge of... am I close here?
No.

What the bill does is make the WDFW Director a position appointed by the governor. The commissions authority will be gutted and essentially turned into an advisory commission for the Director.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


Offline Bushcraft

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1166
  • Location: Olympic Peninsula
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, HHC, WWC, WDAC
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2025, 05:23:05 PM »
Springer and Fitzgibbon. Reps from the 45th and 34th.  What could possibly be their motive?  :chuckle:
Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. - Winston Churchill

Work hard. Hunt hard. Lift other hunters up.

*Proud supporter of NRA, NRA-ILA SCI, SCIF, SCI-PAC, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, WWA, HHC, WWC

Offline TriggerMike

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2014
  • Posts: 2190
  • Location: Central WA
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #12 on: January 28, 2025, 06:17:56 PM »
I'm not the sharpest bulb in the drawer so maybe I'm reading this wrong, but basically they want the current commission and the governor (Ferguson) to appoint the new director who is now in charge of a bunch of stuff that the commission was previously in charge of... am I close here?
No.

What the bill does is make the WDFW Director a position appointed by the governor. The commissions authority will be gutted and essentially turned into an advisory commission for the Director.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
So this is what option #2 in Ruckelshaus report was then?

Online Mtnwalker

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 2274
  • Location: Selah
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2025, 06:26:24 PM »
I'm not the sharpest bulb in the drawer so maybe I'm reading this wrong, but basically they want the current commission and the governor (Ferguson) to appoint the new director who is now in charge of a bunch of stuff that the commission was previously in charge of... am I close here?
No.

What the bill does is make the WDFW Director a position appointed by the governor. The commissions authority will be gutted and essentially turned into an advisory commission for the Director.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Got it. So the governor (Bob Ferguson) appoints a director who is bestowed with much of the authority that was previously held by the runaway commission. Said runaway commission then serves as an advisory role to the Ferguson-appointed Director. And here I was concerned  :chuckle:

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25038
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #14 on: January 28, 2025, 06:48:49 PM »
Ferguson  seems more agnostic on wildlife issues than inslee. I his wife isn't an anti. I see this a little differently.  Not sure it's a good thing but Lorna as director isn't gonna happen.
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Fee Increase by kodiak06
[Today at 03:02:16 PM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by nwmein199
[Today at 02:48:02 PM]


2025 OILS! by johnsc6
[Today at 02:19:08 PM]


Drew Pogue Quality by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 01:19:49 PM]


Who’s walleye fishing? by Skillet
[Today at 11:45:58 AM]


Big J's Powder list by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 11:09:38 AM]


Norway pass Elk by furbearer365
[Today at 11:04:55 AM]


Gorge Wildlife Cams by scotsman
[Today at 09:37:53 AM]


Mason County Youth Buck Nov 1-16 by Elkpiss
[Today at 09:06:28 AM]


VA Loan Closing Costs by pianoman9701
[Today at 08:28:50 AM]


WTS: Seek Outside Cimarron with Pole by pickardjw
[Today at 08:16:38 AM]


Anybody hunt with a 25 Creedmoor? by jjhunter
[Today at 07:19:28 AM]


DR Brush Mower won't crank by Rob
[Today at 06:09:06 AM]


I’m on a blacktail mission by bobcat
[Today at 05:57:56 AM]


Selkirk bull moose. by Turner89
[Yesterday at 09:58:53 PM]


Colockum Archery Bull Tag by oldleclercrd
[Yesterday at 09:10:44 PM]


Fun little Winchester 1890 project by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 08:00:51 PM]


2025 NWTF Jakes Day by wadu1
[Yesterday at 07:04:31 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal